On Civil Rites
In the course of only an few years same-gender marriage has changed from a raging controversy to a fact of life. The only remaining question is how many more states will legalize it before either Congress or the Supreme court does so on a national level. Soon after that we will move on to the next controversy: Polyamory.
While a lot of people who practice polyamory are what we used to call "swingers" in the 70s and 80s, a lot of others are forming long-term complex relationships of more than two people...stable relationships. I expect this demographic to continue to grow over the next decade and the one after that until before long the state will have to grant polyamorous relationships some sort of legal status. There are several compelling reasons why I believe that to be the case.
One of the primary reasons why over half of traditional marriages end in divorce and that percentage is steadily climbing is the weakening of the extended family. Fifty years ago a couple just starting out would live and work in the same city as their parents, their aunts and uncles, and more than a few cousins. This meant that when they hit a rocky patch, there were lots of people they could turn to for advice or support. Today most career paths involve several interstate moves and the nearest relative may be a thousand miles away. The complex marriage may actually strengthen relationships by recreating that larger support network.
In any case, the question of what business the government has in regulating a religious rite has already been raised. It was just raised by the wrong side. The government's only legitimate interest in regulating marriage is to prevent child brides and to insure consent. The religious right wing raised the specious issue of their being forced to preform a wedding they did not believe in, knowing full well that the First Amendment guaranteed that would never happen.
The proper question is, if I choose to preform a marriage ritual for a complex of three men and two women who all love each other and consent to the joining, what business is it of the government's?
I am a sixty-one year old hetero White male and more of my circle of friends are in non-traditional relationships, or have been, that are "normal". I personally know nine close friends that are, or have been, in polyamorous relationships. I am sure there are more who have never mentioned it to me. I know one group who have been together for several years. If one of them becomes seriously ill who has legal consent for treatment? How about next of kin status in case of death? What if they decide to have children?
If these people have committed themselves to each other, then the state ought to make provision for their rights under the law to protect them. A year ago a friend of mine died. Because she was Gay and was not able to be married under the law, her friends spent weeks in a fruitless search for next of kin in her country of birth, England. Because she never drew up a power of attorney, she was cremated by the county. This did not happen because no one could afford to pay for the funeral. It happened because no one could claim the body.
Everyone in a loving relationship should have certain basic rights...and rites, if they so desire.
Be seeing you.